Collapse of the Ussr

Stephen Wears Assess the mall factors of the break-up of the Soviet Union The break up and wantonness of the soviet unification on the 25th December 1991 heralded the closing of the Cold War. It ushered In what had been termed the new being order, furtherto a greater extent, it was suggested by Francis Fauvism to have signaled the fetch up of accounting and the battle of ideas which had dominated much of the twentieth century (Huntington, 1996 31). The skirmish of civilizations had already sympathizen the death of fascism as a credible force in 1945, the close of 1991 would see the end of socialism in Europe.The relatively emergent transgress of the USSR has compelled winkers and analysts to seek answers as to why the worlds second super major power could calve so quickly and so utterly. Can it be attributed to one case-by-case blasting veritable(a)t, or is it far more appropriate to place accuse on a number of contributing factors? The controversy surrounding the co llapse of the USSR has been comp ared to the collapse of the Roman Empire among early(a)s and will excessively continue to be interpreted and reinterpreted for many years to come (Liqueur 1993 387).This turn up will calculate at some of the factors which consider to dissolution and assess the importance of each. The diagnose issues that this essay will assess include the bother of he nationalities, the Geographer factor, economical problems, and the social and political upheavals caused by Perestroika and Glasnost. The Geographer factor must be viewed In the context of state of the country he Inherited from his predecessors coupled with the effectuate of Glasnost and Perestroika. It has been suggested that Glasnost and Perestroika played key roles in hastening the collapse of the worlds second superpower.Glasnost (meaning openness) allowed people to see the flaws In the system and questions were raised as to whether or not communism had been good for Russia. Perestroika (me aning restructuring) also highlighted flaws in the lattice and bureaucratic system that could not be given a quick fix. The economic problems of the USSR have also been cited as a considerable factor in the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The command economy had stifled Innovation and its existence outside of the world economy had caused major(ip) problems. Further to this the USSR could not keep up with the military spending of the USA during the 1 sass.Competing against the military spending of the Reagan Administration as well as fighting a protracted war against the Munched in Afghanistan had all but exhausted the economy of the USSR. The nationalities provided a big problem for any ideas of national unity. It has been argued by Lord William Wallace that it would be very onerous for the European union evolve into a unified state because in that location is a lack of identity and little sense to shared history across the continent (Smith, 2005). This is the identical proble m liner go abouts by soviet leaders to foster a single soviet nationality.The very same Issue had been go about by the Tsarist system before It. ane of the few things the nationalities had in common was the centuries of Russian domination. Sitting on what 75 years before had been the Tsarist Russian Empire, the Soviet union faced same problem as had the Tsarist regime, namely the Incredibly republics of the USSR, was make up of many smaller semi-autonomous republics. Russians formed the biggest ethnic group at bonny over 50%, followed by the Ukrainians with 15% of the total population. other(a) nationalities included Zebu Biliousness chromatic and Volta Attar among many others.The put downfall of the Soviet Union gave an opportunity for peoples across the vast territory from Kampuchea to the Kola Peninsula to enrapture for recognition (Dukes, 1998 332). This suggests that the problem of the nationalities would continue to e a headache for the freshly formed Russian Federat ion. The rise of nationalism added to the troubles faced by the Kremlin during the sass. The harvesting of the Transactions and Baltic Popular Fronts had brought the problem of the nationalities to the fore when in 1989 the blushing(a) Army entered Tidbits to assist the Georgian authorities in putting down a rally.Soviet troops were also used to prop up the communist government of Azerbaijan under threat from nationalist forces (Chubbier, 2001 195). The Baltic States did not adjunction the chorus of statements of sovereignty which had come from Astrakhan and Ukraine, this was because they regarded their incorporation into the USSR as an illegal act. They challenged the honor of the Molotov Robertson pact of 1939 and achieved international support in the form of the American refusal to recognize the annexation of the region (Strayed, 1998 152-153).The policy of Perestroika can be seen as the catalyst for the increase in nationalism as the planned restructuring of the USSR unfa stened fundamental flaws in the Soviet system. The policy of Glasnost also exposed putrefaction within the Caucasian and Central Asian republics, Geographer responded by replacing the Khaki Communist Party leader Sunken with a Russian. This caused a great deal of rioting in Almost (Strayed, 1998 150-151). Further to the rise of popular front movements within the constituent republics, the Soviet Union was also facing a crisis with its East European satellites due in part to the policies of Glasnost and Perestroika.Glasnost and Perestroika are often cited as the most important factors in speeding the demise of the Soviet Union. Eric Hobbies claims that the only thing that do the soviet system treat was the command structure of the party and the state which had been inherited from the days of Stalin (1995 480). in one case again it mimed that mitigate from the top was going to introduce fundamental channelize which was to be ultimately uncontrollable. Hobbies also suggests that glasnost amounted to the revolt of authority and perestroika amounted to the remnant of the old mechanisms which made the economy work (1995 483).Perestroika had to an extent legalized dissent, and groups in cities across the USSR began forming larger political groups cognize as clubs of socially active citizens (Chubbier, 2001 190). This radical departure from the Soviet norm of suppressing membership of political parties other than the Communist Party was acclimated by the decision to stop arrests on the grounds of political activity. The release of political prisoners proverb the growth of new organizations outside of the Soviet system, however by 1988 this opposite word numbered Just a few thousand (Chubbier, 2001 191).Glasnost played a major part in the unraveling of the Soviet Union. It brought forward into stark light the unnumbered of social problems which had 320-321). Part of glasnost and perestroika mired the relaxing of censorship of the press and other media. It was clear to Geographer that hard line censorship was a utile achievement given the increasing public access to western broadcasts, particularly in the aftermath of the Coherency disaster of 1986 (Acton, 1995 320). It was recognized that reform of the economy and wider confederation could not happen under the current level of state censorship.Not even Lenin escaped criticism under glasnost, it was claimed that the October revolution had been an unmitigated disaster for Russia, jumper lead the nation on a long road to nowhere (Acton, 1995 323). Geographer and his policies of glasnost and perestroika briefly faced serious problems with regards to implementation of the reforms. It seemed that Geographer was trying to do the hopeless by marrying completely opposing concepts, socialism with capitalism, totalitarianism with democracy(Chubbier, 2001 194). This was also known as the Geographer Factor.The Geographer Factor stems from the problem of the Soviet Union being alike depend ent on the top figure in government (Chubbier, 2001 194). It was almost impossible to override the powers held by Geographer, even if it did mean following his lead to the destruction of the USSR. It can be argued that this same problem led to economic stagnancy under Brethren and the less than successful schemes of Khrushchev. Regional fragmentation and the erosion of the USSR as a political and economic empire pushed the republics further towards secession, the communist parties in the Baltic States split from the main communist party of the Soviet Union (CUPS).This caused a wave of similar actions in other constituent republics and served to hasten the disintegration of the country. The process of demonstration initiated by Geographer set the Soviet Union on the course to oblivion for it allowed the republics to elect popular governments and vote to secede from the union via referendum. This most significant of these was the referendum held by Ukraine the results of which indicat ed the will of the people to leave the union. save this is at odds with the referendum set down by Geographer regarding the retention and reform of the USSR, which received overwhelming popular support.Nevertheless the simple fact that the largest republic in the USSR other than Russia had voted to leave the union could only have a catastrophic effect on the future of the country as a whole. Geographer had no choice but to accept these events, as there could be no return to Stalinist era of brutal suppression such as that en during the Hungarian Uprising in 1956. Geographer faced opposition to the debut of restructuring and openness to the soviet system. The opposition came to a head in magisterial of 1991, the central state bureaucracy made an attempt at riposte political control of the country (Chubbier, 2001 193).A coup dtat was launched in an attempt to reassert conservative values to the Soviet system. Geographer was put under rear arrest in Crimea while attempts were made at reversing the damage through with(p) by perestroika. This however received no popular support from the public, actuate Boris Yielding to act to put a stop to the coup. Yielding, President of the Russian SF led a tether day resistance movement which involved barricades being set up in central Moscow and just about the White House to prevent the plotters from assuming power (Chubbier, 2001 193).This proved to be Geographers power almost completely eroded, a secret meeting of the leaders of the three main Slavic states declared that the USSR officially ceased to exist. Without a country to lead Geographer tendered his resignation on 25th December 1991. All but louver signatures were present on the declaration of the end of the USSR. The Baltic tastes had long hold their annexation was illegal, Georgia would sign later. The other noticeable absence was that of Mikhail Geographer (Chubbier, 2001 194-195).This essay has given an assessment of the events leading to the dissoluti on of the USSR in 1991. Although it cannot be verbalise with any great certainty that any one factor was more influential than another, it must be noted that Glasnost and Perestroika have not been too far away from any of the issues discussed here. The two flagship policies of Geographer had been intended to complement each other, in reality they had the opposite effect. Attempting to Join opposing concepts was a purposeless exercise which no doubt hastened the demise of the Soviet superpower.The problems faced by the Soviet government ran much deeper than appeared to the Soviet public. Years of economic stagnation and bureaucratic strangulation had left the Soviet Union a exhausted force by the late sass. Robert Strayed suggests that tinkering with its fragile structures would send it the USSR spinning into oblivion (1998 88). hotshot cant avoid this harrowing assessment being very similar to the avowal made by Doll Hitler shortly before launching mathematical process Barbar ous, hat one has only to kick in the door, and the whole shitty edifice will come crashing down.Of course this was a statement of propaganda and should be viewed with that in mind. Ultimately the Soviet Union was broken by a series of intertwining events, both long term and short term, some more important than others but each playing a crucial role. Just as the USSR was established on the ruins of the Tsarist Empire, the newly formed Russian Federation is established on the ruins of the USSR, marked by the raising of the Russian Atrocious, watched by a small group of pro-communist supporters. List of References